Thesis of BBA-04.1
Chapter 4 : Data Analysis and Findings
4.1 Frequency
Distributions
Gender
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Male
|
85
|
94.4
|
94.4
|
94.4
|
Female
|
5
|
5.6
|
5.6
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 1 According to this
table there have 90 frequencies. Here 94.4 percent respondent is male and 5.6
percent respondent is female.
Profession
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Engineers
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
Business Man
|
16
|
17.8
|
17.8
|
24.4
|
|
Masons
|
14
|
15.6
|
15.6
|
40.0
|
|
Students
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
44.4
|
|
Job
|
30
|
33.3
|
33.3
|
77.8
|
|
Housewife
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
78.9
|
|
Retired
|
19
|
21.1
|
21.1
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 2 We have taken
responses seven different types of professions. From those
professions 33.3 percent respondent is service holder, 21.1 percent respondent
is retired, 17.8 percent respondent is businessman, 15.6% respondent is masons.
Age
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
18-30years
|
24
|
26.7
|
26.7
|
26.7
|
31-40years
|
34
|
37.8
|
37.8
|
64.4
|
|
41-50years
|
22
|
24.4
|
24.4
|
88.9
|
|
over50years
|
10
|
11.1
|
11.1
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 3 In this section
there are 37.4% respondent age is (31-40) year’s old, 26% respondent age is
(18-30) years old and 24.4 % respondent is (41-50) year’s.
Income
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Less than 20000
|
31
|
34.4
|
34.4
|
34.4
|
20000-50000
|
33
|
36.7
|
36.7
|
71.1
|
|
51000-75000
|
15
|
16.7
|
16.7
|
87.8
|
|
76000-125000
|
10
|
11.1
|
11.1
|
98.9
|
|
126000-200000
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 4 According to
this table we can see 36.7 percent respondent income is 20000-50000 thousand
taka, 34.4 percentS respondent income is less than 20000 thousand taka and 16.7
percent respondent income is 51000-75000 taka.
Purchased_Cement_Ever
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Yes
|
88
|
97.8
|
97.8
|
97.8
|
No
|
2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 5 According to
this table 98% respondents have purchased cement over. 2.2 percent respondent
are not purchased cement ever.
Mostly_Purchased
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Bashundara
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
Shah
|
17
|
18.9
|
18.9
|
25.6
|
|
Crown
|
10
|
11.1
|
11.1
|
36.7
|
|
Holcim
|
7
|
7.8
|
7.8
|
44.4
|
|
Lafarge Surma
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
48.9
|
|
Fresh
|
10
|
11.1
|
11.1
|
60.0
|
|
Tiger
|
5
|
5.6
|
5.6
|
65.6
|
|
Akij
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
72.2
|
|
Others
|
25
|
27.8
|
27.8
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 6
According to this table
mostly purchased cement brand is Shah Cement 18.9% and then 11.1% people mostly
purchased cement brand are Crown and Fresh. 27.8 percent people purchased
others cement.
Who_Suggested
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Masons
|
30
|
33.3
|
33.3
|
33.3
|
Engineers
|
17
|
18.9
|
18.9
|
52.2
|
|
Relatives
|
13
|
14.4
|
14.4
|
66.7
|
|
Family Member
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
73.3
|
|
Retailers
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
77.8
|
|
No-One
|
16
|
17.8
|
17.8
|
95.6
|
|
Real Estate Company
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 7 In this table
we see that people took suggestion mostly 33.3 % from masons and 18.9% people
suggested by engineer then 14.4% people suggested by relatives. 17.8 percent
people purchased cement no one suggests there.
Suggest_Others
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Yes
|
62
|
68.9
|
68.9
|
68.9
|
No
|
28
|
31.1
|
31.1
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 8 According to
this table 68.9 percent respondent are Suggest other and 31.1% respondent are
don’t suggest others
Which_Cement_Suggest_Others
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Bashundara
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
Shah
|
14
|
15.6
|
15.6
|
22.2
|
|
Crown
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
26.7
|
|
Holcim
|
7
|
7.8
|
7.8
|
34.4
|
|
Lafarge Surma
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
38.9
|
|
Fresh
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
45.6
|
|
Tiger
|
3
|
3.3
|
3.3
|
48.9
|
|
Akij
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
55.6
|
|
Others
|
40
|
44.4
|
44.4
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 9In this table
15.6% respondent are suggested Shah Cement and 7.8% are suggested Holcim
cement. 6.7% respondent suggest Bashundara and Akij cement. 4.4% suggest
Lafarge Surma cement.
Prefer_Country_Of_Origin
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Bangladesh
|
77
|
85.6
|
85.6
|
85.6
|
Germany
|
5
|
5.6
|
5.6
|
91.1
|
|
Others
|
7
|
7.8
|
7.8
|
98.9
|
|
5
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 10
In this stage we see
about 86 percent people choose Bangladeshi cement then 7.8 percent people
choose Bangladeshi and foreign cement.
Factor_1
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Family Member
|
10
|
11.1
|
11.1
|
11.1
|
Peers
|
2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
13.3
|
|
TV Ads
|
9
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
23.3
|
|
Point Of sales
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
24.4
|
|
Engineers
|
19
|
21.1
|
21.1
|
45.6
|
|
Masons
|
33
|
36.7
|
36.7
|
82.2
|
|
Real Estate Companies
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
86.7
|
|
Retailers
|
12
|
13.3
|
13.3
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 11 In this table
we found that 36.7% respondents were heard information from masons about cement
brand. 21.1% respondent heard from engineers, 13.3% heard from retailer and
11.1% respondent heard information from family members.
Standard_Price_Range
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
300-350
|
20
|
22.2
|
22.2
|
22.2
|
351-400
|
36
|
40.0
|
40.0
|
62.2
|
|
401-450
|
29
|
32.2
|
32.2
|
94.4
|
|
451-500
|
5
|
5.6
|
5.6
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 12
According to this table
40% people think that cement standard price should be 351-400 taka then 32.2 %
people think that cement standard should 401-450 taka. 22.2% people are think
that cement standard price is 300-350
Factor_2
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Family members
|
14
|
15.6
|
15.6
|
15.6
|
peers
|
8
|
8.9
|
8.9
|
24.4
|
|
TV Ads
|
23
|
25.6
|
25.6
|
50.0
|
|
Point Of Sales
|
3
|
3.3
|
3.3
|
53.3
|
|
Engineers
|
14
|
15.6
|
15.6
|
68.9
|
|
Masons
|
16
|
17.8
|
17.8
|
86.7
|
|
Real Estate Companies
|
3
|
3.3
|
3.3
|
90.0
|
|
Retailers
|
9
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 13
According to this table
we found that 25.6% respondents were heard information from TV Ads about cement
brand.
Most_Preferred_Cement
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Bashundara
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
Shah
|
17
|
18.9
|
18.9
|
25.6
|
|
Crown
|
10
|
11.1
|
11.1
|
36.7
|
|
Holcim
|
7
|
7.8
|
7.8
|
44.4
|
|
Lafarge Surma
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
48.9
|
|
Fresh
|
10
|
11.1
|
11.1
|
60.0
|
|
Tiger
|
5
|
5.6
|
5.6
|
65.6
|
|
Akij
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
72.2
|
|
Others
|
25
|
27.8
|
27.8
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 14
In this table we can see
that maximum people mostly preferred difference type of cement. About 19%
people preferred shah cement and 11.1% people preferred crown and fresh cement.
Factor_3
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Family Members
|
12
|
13.3
|
13.3
|
13.3
|
Peers
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
20.0
|
|
TV Ads
|
32
|
35.6
|
35.6
|
55.6
|
|
Point Of Sales
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
62.2
|
|
Engineers
|
3
|
3.3
|
3.3
|
65.6
|
|
Masons
|
13
|
14.4
|
14.4
|
80.0
|
|
Real Estate Companies
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
86.7
|
|
Retailers
|
11
|
12.2
|
12.2
|
98.9
|
|
others
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 15
According to this table
we found that (Factor-3) 35.6% respondents were heard information from TV Ads
about cement brand.
Criteria_1
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
Price
|
12
|
13.3
|
13.3
|
13.3
|
Country Of origin
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
14.4
|
|
Durability
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
18.9
|
|
Quality
|
60
|
66.7
|
66.7
|
85.6
|
|
Avilability
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
86.7
|
|
Brand Name
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
91.1
|
|
Gypsum
|
2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
93.3
|
|
Fly-Ash Free
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
97.8
|
|
Thickness
|
2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 16
In this table we see
about 67 % people think that cement should purchase on the basis quality and
13.3 % people think that purchase Cement on the basis of price. 4.4% people
purchased cement basis of brand name.
Criteria_2
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
price
|
24
|
26.7
|
26.7
|
26.7
|
Timely delrviry
|
5
|
5.6
|
5.6
|
32.2
|
|
Packaging
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
38.9
|
|
Country of origin
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
40.0
|
|
Durability
|
8
|
8.9
|
8.9
|
48.9
|
|
Quality
|
15
|
16.7
|
16.7
|
65.6
|
|
Availity
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
72.2
|
|
Ads
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
73.3
|
|
Brand name
|
5
|
5.6
|
5.6
|
78.9
|
|
Gypsum
|
12
|
13.3
|
13.3
|
92.2
|
|
Fly Ash free
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
98.9
|
|
Thickness
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 17
In this stage we can see
that about 27 percent people purchase cement on the basis of price and about 17
% people purchase cement on the basis of quality and 13.3 % on the basis of
gypsum. 6.7% purchased basis of availability and fly-ash free.
Criteria_3
|
|||||
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent
|
||
Valid
|
price
|
15
|
16.7
|
16.7
|
16.7
|
Timely delivery
|
3
|
3.3
|
3.3
|
20.0
|
|
packaging
|
9
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
30.0
|
|
Country of origin
|
2
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
32.2
|
|
Durability
|
8
|
8.9
|
8.9
|
41.1
|
|
Quality
|
4
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
45.6
|
|
Availability
|
14
|
15.6
|
15.6
|
61.1
|
|
Ads
|
5
|
5.6
|
5.6
|
66.7
|
|
Brand name
|
8
|
8.9
|
8.9
|
75.6
|
|
Others
|
1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
76.7
|
|
Gypsum
|
6
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
83.3
|
|
Fly ash free
|
10
|
11.1
|
11.1
|
94.4
|
|
Thickness
|
5
|
5.6
|
5.6
|
100.0
|
|
Total
|
90
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Table: 18
On this table we can see
that people mostly purchase Cement on the basis of price. Then respondents
purchased cement on the basis of availability.
No comments