Thesis of BBA-04.1
Chapter 4 : Data Analysis and Findings
4.1 Frequency
Distributions
| 
Gender | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Male | 
85 | 
94.4 | 
94.4 | 
94.4 | 
| 
Female | 
5 | 
5.6 | 
5.6 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 1 According to this
table there have 90 frequencies. Here 94.4 percent respondent is male and 5.6
percent respondent is female.
| 
Profession | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Engineers | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
| 
Business Man | 
16 | 
17.8 | 
17.8 | 
24.4 | |
| 
Masons | 
14 | 
15.6 | 
15.6 | 
40.0 | |
| 
Students | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
44.4 | |
| 
Job | 
30 | 
33.3 | 
33.3 | 
77.8 | |
| 
Housewife | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
78.9 | |
| 
Retired | 
19 | 
21.1 | 
21.1 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 2 We have taken
responses seven different types of professions.  From those
professions 33.3 percent respondent is service holder, 21.1 percent respondent
is retired, 17.8 percent respondent is businessman, 15.6% respondent is masons.
| 
Age | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
18-30years | 
24 | 
26.7 | 
26.7 | 
26.7 | 
| 
31-40years | 
34 | 
37.8 | 
37.8 | 
64.4 | |
| 
41-50years | 
22 | 
24.4 | 
24.4 | 
88.9 | |
| 
over50years | 
10 | 
11.1 | 
11.1 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 3 In this section
there are 37.4% respondent age is (31-40) year’s old, 26% respondent age is
(18-30) years old and 24.4 % respondent is (41-50) year’s.
| 
Income | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Less than 20000 | 
31 | 
34.4 | 
34.4 | 
34.4 | 
| 
20000-50000 | 
33 | 
36.7 | 
36.7 | 
71.1 | |
| 
51000-75000 | 
15 | 
16.7 | 
16.7 | 
87.8 | |
| 
76000-125000 | 
10 | 
11.1 | 
11.1 | 
98.9 | |
| 
126000-200000 | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 4 According to
this table we can see 36.7 percent respondent income is 20000-50000 thousand
taka, 34.4 percentS respondent income is less than 20000 thousand taka and 16.7
percent respondent income is 51000-75000 taka.
| 
Purchased_Cement_Ever | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Yes | 
88 | 
97.8 | 
97.8 | 
97.8 | 
| 
No | 
2 | 
2.2 | 
2.2 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 5 According to
this table 98% respondents have purchased cement over. 2.2 percent respondent
are not purchased cement ever.
| 
Mostly_Purchased | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Bashundara | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
| 
Shah | 
17 | 
18.9 | 
18.9 | 
25.6 | |
| 
Crown | 
10 | 
11.1 | 
11.1 | 
36.7 | |
| 
Holcim | 
7 | 
7.8 | 
7.8 | 
44.4 | |
| 
Lafarge Surma | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
48.9 | |
| 
Fresh | 
10 | 
11.1 | 
11.1 | 
60.0 | |
| 
Tiger | 
5 | 
5.6 | 
5.6 | 
65.6 | |
| 
Akij | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
72.2 | |
| 
Others | 
25 | 
27.8 | 
27.8 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 6
According to this table
mostly purchased cement brand is Shah Cement 18.9% and then 11.1% people mostly
purchased cement brand are Crown and Fresh. 27.8 percent people purchased
others cement.
| 
Who_Suggested | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Masons | 
30 | 
33.3 | 
33.3 | 
33.3 | 
| 
Engineers | 
17 | 
18.9 | 
18.9 | 
52.2 | |
| 
Relatives | 
13 | 
14.4 | 
14.4 | 
66.7 | |
| 
Family Member | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
73.3 | |
| 
Retailers | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
77.8 | |
| 
No-One | 
16 | 
17.8 | 
17.8 | 
95.6 | |
| 
Real Estate Company | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 7 In this table
we see that people took suggestion mostly 33.3 % from masons and 18.9% people
suggested by engineer then 14.4% people suggested by relatives. 17.8 percent
people purchased cement no one suggests there.
| 
Suggest_Others | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Yes | 
62 | 
68.9 | 
68.9 | 
68.9 | 
| 
No | 
28 | 
31.1 | 
31.1 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 8 According to
this table 68.9 percent respondent are Suggest other and 31.1% respondent are
don’t suggest others
| 
Which_Cement_Suggest_Others | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Bashundara | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
| 
Shah | 
14 | 
15.6 | 
15.6 | 
22.2 | |
| 
Crown | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
26.7 | |
| 
Holcim | 
7 | 
7.8 | 
7.8 | 
34.4 | |
| 
Lafarge Surma | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
38.9 | |
| 
Fresh | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
45.6 | |
| 
Tiger | 
3 | 
3.3 | 
3.3 | 
48.9 | |
| 
Akij | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
55.6 | |
| 
Others | 
40 | 
44.4 | 
44.4 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 9In this table
15.6% respondent are suggested Shah Cement and 7.8% are suggested Holcim
cement. 6.7% respondent suggest Bashundara and Akij cement. 4.4% suggest
Lafarge Surma cement.
| 
Prefer_Country_Of_Origin | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Bangladesh | 
77 | 
85.6 | 
85.6 | 
85.6 | 
| 
Germany | 
5 | 
5.6 | 
5.6 | 
91.1 | |
| 
Others | 
7 | 
7.8 | 
7.8 | 
98.9 | |
| 
5 | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 10
In this stage we see
about 86 percent people choose Bangladeshi cement then 7.8 percent people
choose Bangladeshi and foreign cement.
| 
Factor_1 | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Family Member | 
10 | 
11.1 | 
11.1 | 
11.1 | 
| 
Peers | 
2 | 
2.2 | 
2.2 | 
13.3 | |
| 
TV Ads | 
9 | 
10.0 | 
10.0 | 
23.3 | |
| 
Point Of sales | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
24.4 | |
| 
Engineers | 
19 | 
21.1 | 
21.1 | 
45.6 | |
| 
Masons | 
33 | 
36.7 | 
36.7 | 
82.2 | |
| 
Real Estate Companies | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
86.7 | |
| 
Retailers | 
12 | 
13.3 | 
13.3 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 11 In this table
we found that 36.7% respondents were heard information from masons about cement
brand. 21.1% respondent heard from engineers, 13.3% heard from retailer and
11.1% respondent heard information from family members.
| 
Standard_Price_Range | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
300-350 | 
20 | 
22.2 | 
22.2 | 
22.2 | 
| 
351-400 | 
36 | 
40.0 | 
40.0 | 
62.2 | |
| 
401-450 | 
29 | 
32.2 | 
32.2 | 
94.4 | |
| 
451-500 | 
5 | 
5.6 | 
5.6 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 12
According to this table
40% people think that cement standard price should be 351-400 taka then 32.2 %
people think that cement standard should 401-450 taka. 22.2% people are think
that cement standard price is 300-350
| 
Factor_2 | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Family members | 
14 | 
15.6 | 
15.6 | 
15.6 | 
| 
peers | 
8 | 
8.9 | 
8.9 | 
24.4 | |
| 
TV Ads | 
23 | 
25.6 | 
25.6 | 
50.0 | |
| 
Point Of Sales | 
3 | 
3.3 | 
3.3 | 
53.3 | |
| 
Engineers | 
14 | 
15.6 | 
15.6 | 
68.9 | |
| 
Masons | 
16 | 
17.8 | 
17.8 | 
86.7 | |
| 
Real Estate Companies | 
3 | 
3.3 | 
3.3 | 
90.0 | |
| 
Retailers | 
9 | 
10.0 | 
10.0 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 13
According to this table
we found that 25.6% respondents were heard information from TV Ads about cement
brand.
| 
                                                   Most_Preferred_Cement | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Bashundara | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
| 
Shah | 
17 | 
18.9 | 
18.9 | 
25.6 | |
| 
Crown | 
10 | 
11.1 | 
11.1 | 
36.7 | |
| 
Holcim | 
7 | 
7.8 | 
7.8 | 
44.4 | |
| 
Lafarge Surma | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
48.9 | |
| 
Fresh | 
10 | 
11.1 | 
11.1 | 
60.0 | |
| 
Tiger | 
5 | 
5.6 | 
5.6 | 
65.6 | |
| 
Akij | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
72.2 | |
| 
Others | 
25 | 
27.8 | 
27.8 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 14
In this table we can see
that maximum people mostly preferred difference type of cement. About 19%
people preferred shah cement and 11.1% people preferred crown and fresh cement.
| 
Factor_3 | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Family Members | 
12 | 
13.3 | 
13.3 | 
13.3 | 
| 
Peers | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
20.0 | |
| 
TV Ads | 
32 | 
35.6 | 
35.6 | 
55.6 | |
| 
Point Of Sales | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
62.2 | |
| 
Engineers | 
3 | 
3.3 | 
3.3 | 
65.6 | |
| 
Masons | 
13 | 
14.4 | 
14.4 | 
80.0 | |
| 
Real Estate Companies | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
86.7 | |
| 
Retailers | 
11 | 
12.2 | 
12.2 | 
98.9 | |
| 
others | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 15
According to this table
we found that (Factor-3) 35.6% respondents were heard information from TV Ads
about cement brand.
| 
Criteria_1 | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
Price | 
12 | 
13.3 | 
13.3 | 
13.3 | 
| 
Country Of origin | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
14.4 | |
| 
Durability | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
18.9 | |
| 
Quality | 
60 | 
66.7 | 
66.7 | 
85.6 | |
| 
Avilability | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
86.7 | |
| 
Brand Name | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
91.1 | |
| 
Gypsum | 
2 | 
2.2 | 
2.2 | 
93.3 | |
| 
Fly-Ash Free | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
97.8 | |
| 
Thickness | 
2 | 
2.2 | 
2.2 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 16
In this table we see
about 67 % people think that cement should purchase on the basis quality and
13.3 % people think that purchase Cement on the basis of price. 4.4% people
purchased cement basis of brand name.
| 
Criteria_2 | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
price | 
24 | 
26.7 | 
26.7 | 
26.7 | 
| 
Timely delrviry | 
5 | 
5.6 | 
5.6 | 
32.2 | |
| 
Packaging | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
38.9 | |
| 
Country of origin | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
40.0 | |
| 
Durability | 
8 | 
8.9 | 
8.9 | 
48.9 | |
| 
Quality | 
15 | 
16.7 | 
16.7 | 
65.6 | |
| 
Availity | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
72.2 | |
| 
Ads | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
73.3 | |
| 
Brand name | 
5 | 
5.6 | 
5.6 | 
78.9 | |
| 
Gypsum | 
12 | 
13.3 | 
13.3 | 
92.2 | |
| 
Fly Ash free | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
98.9 | |
| 
Thickness | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 17
In this stage we can see
that about 27 percent people purchase cement on the basis of price and about 17
% people purchase cement on the basis of quality and 13.3 % on the basis of
gypsum. 6.7% purchased basis of availability and fly-ash free.
| 
Criteria_3 | |||||
| 
Frequency | 
Percent | 
Valid Percent | 
Cumulative Percent | ||
| 
Valid | 
price | 
15 | 
16.7 | 
16.7 | 
16.7 | 
| 
Timely delivery | 
3 | 
3.3 | 
3.3 | 
20.0 | |
| 
packaging | 
9 | 
10.0 | 
10.0 | 
30.0 | |
| 
Country of origin | 
2 | 
2.2 | 
2.2 | 
32.2 | |
| 
Durability | 
8 | 
8.9 | 
8.9 | 
41.1 | |
| 
Quality | 
4 | 
4.4 | 
4.4 | 
45.6 | |
| 
Availability | 
14 | 
15.6 | 
15.6 | 
61.1 | |
| 
Ads | 
5 | 
5.6 | 
5.6 | 
66.7 | |
| 
Brand name | 
8 | 
8.9 | 
8.9 | 
75.6 | |
| 
Others | 
1 | 
1.1 | 
1.1 | 
76.7 | |
| 
Gypsum | 
6 | 
6.7 | 
6.7 | 
83.3 | |
| 
Fly ash free | 
10 | 
11.1 | 
11.1 | 
94.4 | |
| 
Thickness | 
5 | 
5.6 | 
5.6 | 
100.0 | |
| 
Total | 
90 | 
100.0 | 
100.0 | ||
Table: 18
On this table we can see
that people mostly purchase Cement on the basis of price. Then respondents
purchased cement on the basis of availability.

 
 
 
No comments